Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self‐assessments: a pilot study

Identifieur interne : 006A27 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 006A26; suivant : 006A28

Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self‐assessments: a pilot study

Auteurs : T. A. Trovik ; T. I. Berge [Norvège]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:3ED8CF34D4D13095E7CE8F3E40FB02E22DE8B8B5

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Summary  This study aimed to test the hypothesis stating no difference in number of teeth or tooth gaps counted by the dentist or the patient. The sample consisted of 49 randomly selected regular patients and their dentists (response rate 10%, 53% males). Mean age of the patients was 53·6 ± 11·9 years. The mean number of teeth was 26·5, 20/49 reported tooth gaps (excluding second and third molars) and 12/20 had visible gaps. The calculation of patients’ detection of gaps showed a sensitivity = 79%, specificity = 96% and a positive predictive value of 95%. The patients reported more teeth in the maxilla and fewer teeth in the mandible compared with their dentists. More teeth were misdiagnosed as the number of teeth increased in the mandible. Patients reported more gaps than dentists in both jaws (NS); an average of 0·04, 0·18 and 0·22 misdiagnosed gaps in the maxilla, mandible and for both jaws respectively. Agreement on tooth present/missing in the maxilla was 91·3% (±9·82) and in the mandible 88·2% (±10·44). Correlation between self‐report and dentist’s report of the number of teeth present and the number of gaps in the maxilla was (Pearson’s r) 0·94 and 0·83. One person with self‐perceived visible gaps and five persons with non‐visible gaps were recommended treatment; two persons agreed about a treatment need. Self‐assessments of tooth gaps show limited but acceptable sensitivity and excellent specificity. No significant differences in tooth counting were found when comparing self‐reports and dentists’ reports. The study should be tried on a larger scale.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01778.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self‐assessments: a pilot study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Trovik, T A" sort="Trovik, T A" uniqKey="Trovik T" first="T. A." last="Trovik">T. A. Trovik</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Berge, T I" sort="Berge, T I" uniqKey="Berge T" first="T. I." last="Berge">T. I. Berge</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3ED8CF34D4D13095E7CE8F3E40FB02E22DE8B8B5</idno>
<date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01778.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3ED8CF34D4D13095E7CE8F3E40FB02E22DE8B8B5/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001E86</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001E86</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001E86</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002977</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002977</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2007:Trovik T:do:tooth:gaps</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:17919247</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">002348</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">001E53</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">001E53</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">001E53</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2007:Trovik T:do:tooth:gaps</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">006B35</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">006A27</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">006A27</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self‐assessments: a pilot study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Trovik, T A" sort="Trovik, T A" uniqKey="Trovik T" first="T. A." last="Trovik">T. A. Trovik</name>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Department of Oral Sciences – Centre for Clinical Dental Research</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Berge, T I" sort="Berge, T I" uniqKey="Berge T" first="T. I." last="Berge">T. I. Berge</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Norvège</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Sciences – Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Bergen</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">34</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="814">814</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="820">820</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2007-11">2007-11</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Acceptable sensitivity</term>
<term>Acta odontol scand</term>
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term>
<term>Attitude to Health</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Central bureau</term>
<term>Clinical diagnosis</term>
<term>Clinical examination</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental appearance</term>
<term>Dental arch</term>
<term>Dental implant treatment</term>
<term>Dental treatment</term>
<term>Dentist</term>
<term>Dentist-Patient Relations</term>
<term>Epidemiol</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Fewer teeth</term>
<term>Gap</term>
<term>General health</term>
<term>Health status</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnosis)</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Larger scale</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Many teeth</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxilla mandible</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Misdiagnosed</term>
<term>Misdiagnosed teeth</term>
<term>Molar</term>
<term>Molar region</term>
<term>More dentists</term>
<term>More gaps</term>
<term>More teeth</term>
<term>Norway</term>
<term>Norwegian</term>
<term>Norwegian dentist population</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Partial prosthesis</term>
<term>Pilot Projects</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Posterior teeth</term>
<term>Present teeth</term>
<term>Public health dent</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Response rate</term>
<term>Self-Assessment</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
<term>Third molar</term>
<term>Third molars</term>
<term>Tooth counts</term>
<term>Tooth diagnosis</term>
<term>Tooth gaps</term>
<term>Tooth gaps show</term>
<term>Tooth level</term>
<term>Tooth loss</term>
<term>Tooth position</term>
<term>Tooth spaces</term>
<term>Treatment need</term>
<term>Visible gaps</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Attitude du personnel soignant</term>
<term>Attitude envers la santé</term>
<term>Auto-évaluation (psychologie)</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (diagnostic)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Norvège</term>
<term>Projets pilotes</term>
<term>Relations dentiste-patient</term>
<term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term>
<term>Sensibilité et spécificité</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en">
<term>Norway</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Acceptable sensitivity</term>
<term>Acta odontol scand</term>
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term>
<term>Attitude to Health</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Central bureau</term>
<term>Clinical diagnosis</term>
<term>Clinical examination</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental appearance</term>
<term>Dental arch</term>
<term>Dental implant treatment</term>
<term>Dental treatment</term>
<term>Dentist</term>
<term>Dentist-Patient Relations</term>
<term>Epidemiol</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Fewer teeth</term>
<term>Gap</term>
<term>General health</term>
<term>Health status</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Larger scale</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Many teeth</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxilla mandible</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Misdiagnosed</term>
<term>Misdiagnosed teeth</term>
<term>Molar</term>
<term>Molar region</term>
<term>More dentists</term>
<term>More gaps</term>
<term>More teeth</term>
<term>Norway</term>
<term>Norwegian</term>
<term>Norwegian dentist population</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Partial prosthesis</term>
<term>Pilot Projects</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Posterior teeth</term>
<term>Present teeth</term>
<term>Public health dent</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Response rate</term>
<term>Self-Assessment</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
<term>Third molar</term>
<term>Third molars</term>
<term>Tooth counts</term>
<term>Tooth diagnosis</term>
<term>Tooth gaps</term>
<term>Tooth gaps show</term>
<term>Tooth level</term>
<term>Tooth loss</term>
<term>Tooth position</term>
<term>Tooth spaces</term>
<term>Treatment need</term>
<term>Visible gaps</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Attitude du personnel soignant</term>
<term>Attitude envers la santé</term>
<term>Auto-évaluation (psychologie)</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Norvège</term>
<term>Projets pilotes</term>
<term>Relations dentiste-patient</term>
<term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term>
<term>Sensibilité et spécificité</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Dentiste</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Summary  This study aimed to test the hypothesis stating no difference in number of teeth or tooth gaps counted by the dentist or the patient. The sample consisted of 49 randomly selected regular patients and their dentists (response rate 10%, 53% males). Mean age of the patients was 53·6 ± 11·9 years. The mean number of teeth was 26·5, 20/49 reported tooth gaps (excluding second and third molars) and 12/20 had visible gaps. The calculation of patients’ detection of gaps showed a sensitivity = 79%, specificity = 96% and a positive predictive value of 95%. The patients reported more teeth in the maxilla and fewer teeth in the mandible compared with their dentists. More teeth were misdiagnosed as the number of teeth increased in the mandible. Patients reported more gaps than dentists in both jaws (NS); an average of 0·04, 0·18 and 0·22 misdiagnosed gaps in the maxilla, mandible and for both jaws respectively. Agreement on tooth present/missing in the maxilla was 91·3% (±9·82) and in the mandible 88·2% (±10·44). Correlation between self‐report and dentist’s report of the number of teeth present and the number of gaps in the maxilla was (Pearson’s r) 0·94 and 0·83. One person with self‐perceived visible gaps and five persons with non‐visible gaps were recommended treatment; two persons agreed about a treatment need. Self‐assessments of tooth gaps show limited but acceptable sensitivity and excellent specificity. No significant differences in tooth counting were found when comparing self‐reports and dentists’ reports. The study should be tried on a larger scale.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Norvège</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Trovik, T A" sort="Trovik, T A" uniqKey="Trovik T" first="T. A." last="Trovik">T. A. Trovik</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Norvège">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Berge, T I" sort="Berge, T I" uniqKey="Berge T" first="T. I." last="Berge">T. I. Berge</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006A27 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 006A27 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:3ED8CF34D4D13095E7CE8F3E40FB02E22DE8B8B5
   |texte=   Do tooth gaps matter? Evaluation of self‐assessments: a pilot study
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022